I cannot agree

 

.

 

So let me get this straight this thread is arguing that fat people are better lovers than skinny people ?

 

I think this thread took a wrong turn somewhere.

 

A few wrong turns and a bumpy road!!! Lol

 

Well said

 

It happens when its open to everyone to comment on, but like I said in the opening one I was ready for the ones that want to say Im wrong

 

Its subjective mate,i like a little more to hold on to yet some of society see anyone with a little extra to love as a lazy person or unattractive.Just because the media claims that size zero is the only way to be some people are blinkered.I say if it feels good and turns you on thats all that matters

 

Yes most do look at it as being lazy, but honestly that's not the case in some. Yes I say some cause it is true that it does point to being lazy. I have always worked a physical job and even have worked out and the weight I carry is just there and im ok with it cause it doesn't control my life only I control what I can and cant do

 

I'm new to this forum but I have to disagree with your premise that larger people make better lovers. In itself, in my experiences it hasn't been the SIZE of the person that made them a better lover - it was what more about how loving the person was and appreciative of the sexual experience. HOW THAT person expressed themselves as a lover, was more due to a lot of factors, only some of which could be directly attributed to their body size BUT more so... about what they thought of themselves and others around them - Their PERSONALITY made a lot of difference!

Now, I'll grant you that you may not like a Pelvic Bone being thrust into your private parts... Who does? But a skinny person's bONES being thrust into me has only been in issue when they were on top, in a Cowgirl position. A woman on all fours is only putting her "fluffiest" parts towards you during missionary sex.

If you like BIG women for the cuddling, I would have to agree... their cushioning does make for a pleasurable TEDDY BEAR feel that skinny, "boney" women don't have.... but that doesn't make Skinny women less loving or Sincere lovers.

Now, everyone's experiences are different... and the following is simply based on MY experiences:

A Shallow person, be them skinny or FAT, will usually not turn out to be MY idea of a better lover... If she's expertly skilled in getting me off is GREAT in the short term but give me a LOVING, CARING and truly AFFECTIONATE woman any day.. whether SHE is Skinny or FAT, Muscular or lacking muscularity any time!

 

If You want to see lazy size take you average Rugby prop. I will stand under correction here But as far as I know Os Durant was 6.3 and weighed in at 300 pounds the day he played 80 minutes and became one in about 5 people to ever have won the world cup of rugby twice. Just because people are fat does not mean they are lazy.
The most fun I have had was with a women who matched my weight.

 

I read the title, and thought "...why?"
Not in a bad way. I loved sex with some plumper girls. And before I met my partner, the best sex had been with a bigger girl. But I'm of the opinion that size is in no way relevant (unless we're talking extreems in one direction OR another). And being overweight can be limiting, past certain point. Which may or may not be an issue. I just don't see how adding limitatons help.

And the whole pelvic bone thing... Sorry. I have no idea what you're talking about. I mean... I know what pelvic bone is. Just never had any discomfort. And I'm rather skinny myself and have been with very skinny girls as well.

At the end of the day, I love plump girls. I really do. But I don't preffer it. I enjoy looking at, touching and licking a plu girl's body as much as I do skinny. I'm a freak and my taste in women has pretty much nothing to do with their size. Nor do I think their size has any influence for quality if sex.

 

I have seen some big girls go into positions that almost scared me. I am a big guy 52 inch chest. I prefer curvy women because I'm scared of crushing a small framed lady. But that's my own insecurities. I find most women of all sizes are sexy in their own way.

 

No such thing as cant,if you want it bad enough theres always a way.Your comfortable with your weight but many bigger people are not and it really affects them

 

I'm 5'8" / 173cm in height, 11 stone / 70kg in weight...pretty average really. Heavier set gents are exquisite lovers. This of course is my opinion & I have been known to be wrong before...however, much of being an exquisite lover is reliant on the appropriate use of mind along with body. Put another way, you wouldn't put a large nail in with a small hammer.
X

 

I've had partners of many heights and weights, from smaller than me to a guy whose waist measurement was the same as my height. I enjoyed sex with most of them. The ones I didn't enjoy were more related to personality, lack of skill, and not listening to me. A person's size isn't a dealmaker or a dealbreaker for me.

 

Fat men are alright if you can get past the smell and their tiny dicks.

 

That has nothing to do with being fat its how they take care of themselves, as far as the tiny dick some just aren't blessed to be swinging 12inchs. But I also say a battle ship looks small in the ocean, could also be throwing a hot dog down a hallway. So you cant always judge the way one is for all. Thanks for the comment

 

Methinks you are still trying to kid yourself because YOU admit to being big yourself.
I am small but would never attempt to say small men or women are better lovers - that would be a silly statement!
Most of the replies here say that size doesn't matter, but that expertise, consideration and love are more important.
Most of the ones who agree with you are plus size themselves - I think it is head out of the sand time!
How anyone can seriously say that fat people can perform better than thin people is beyond me, the same occasionally, but never better!
I have had all sizes in bed with me, and it certainly isn't the fat ones that are generally more athletic,
or reach parts that others can't reach, or get into better positions than smaller guys!
Fat or thin have their own delights - but BETTER? Seriously now - BETTER? Sorry, not in this girl's experience!

 

You're saying because you have a wide midsection you can hit places better than a fit guy could because you can spread them out more? That's hilarious.. I guarantee you that I can spreads a woman's legs MUCH father apart with my hands on her ankles spreading her legs than a fat guys midsection does.. an arm span is much wider than your midsection.

This thread makes no sense and is nothing short of offensive and ignorant.. But the laughability of some of the one way "insight" you've managed to suggest is incredible